This is the subject of my teachings, and I go on describing all the different causes the movement of the stars across the Universe might spring from. Among these hypotheses, only one must be the right explanation, but which one deserves the crown is still beyond the grasp of those who move at an honest pace through the path to knowledge.Titus Lucretius Carus, On the Nature of Things
Welcome to my personal blog! What follows is a list of the categories of this website. Click on the title to see the articles it contains. A list of categories is available on the left of this page too (if you are browsing on a PC).
- Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
- Medicine (POTS, Lyme disease, etc)
- Sciences (articles about various disciplines: mathematics, life sciences, mechanics, etc)
- Paolo Maccallini (a collection of autobiographycal notes, short stories, and drawings)
A collection of most of my writings on mechanics, mathematics, biomedicine is available on my Academia page.
Below you find a list of all the articles of this website, ordered from the most recent one to the very first article, published in 2016. Some blog posts are only in Italian, but you can translate them into your language of choice by using the bar on the left.
As for the quote from the poem On the Nature of Things by Lucretius, an early example of scientific divulgation, I’ve crafted a translation that sacrifices adherence to the original hexameters and gives up on metric, in favor of the inner meaning that I think these verses bear. The original hexameters in Latin are the following ones:
… id doceo, plurisque sequor disponere causas,Titus Lucretius Carus, De Rerum Natura, V 529-533
motibus astrorum quae possint esse per omne;
e quibus una tamen sit et hic quoque causa necessest,
quae vegeat motum signis; sed quae sit earum
praecipere haudquaquam est pedetemptim progredientis.
The reader may have recognized some similarities with ideas promoted by natural philosophers who were born after Galileo had started the scientific revolution, about sixteen centuries apart from the end of Lucretius’ life. Besides the obvious “Hypotheses non fingo” by which Newton admitted that even though his mathematical model described so well the movement of planets, he had no idea of the cause of gravity; besides that, we can also mention Chamberlin’s “Method of Multiple Working Hypotheses” that seems to follow the footprints of these few lines from the fifth book of De Rerum Natura. Lines in which almost a presage of the convergence of a Baconian series can perhaps be acknowledged; a prophecy that has traveled through twenty centuries to teach us what we have painfully learned again during this vertiginous hiatus and that we often forget about.
Get new content delivered directly to your inbox.